Do Residency Bans Drive Sex Offenders Underground?

Early last year, Los Angeles set aside a sliver of land in its Harbor Gateway neighborhood for the city’s newest and smallest park: two jungle gyms on a fifth of an acre.

The project was more than just an effort to increase the city’s green space. City Council members made clear that one of the park’s principal reasons for existence was to force 33 people on the California sex offender registry who were living in a nearby apartment building to move out. State law bars those on its registry from living within 2,000 feet of a park or school. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, you had all those registered citizens in Harbor Gateway because it was hard for them to legally be anyplace else. If you get rid of the residency restrictions, you get rid of what caused the clustering of offenders in the first place. Lets help Harbor Gateway by getting rid of those restrictions.
And I hate to say it, but some of the general population of Harbor Gateway may need counseling so as to reduce their level of fear and ignorance.

It seems to me that it shold be unlawful to creat a micro park, or any park, for the purpose of harassing RSOs out of an area.

YES IT DOES!

Seems like a no brainer to me…let’s see…”YOU ARE NOT WELCOME” and you are not welcome anywhere actually…so kinda makes it difficult to even exist “legally” trying to find someone to rent to you.

Now..make a LAW that allows legal discrimination to make finding a place to live even more difficult (actually impossible because we would be breaking the “law”)!

So if that were aimed at ANY OTHER minority it would be illegal and civil rights lawyers might actually be interested in helping right the wrong. Say it was aimed at Blacks, Jews, or Gays…BUT…lump a group of completely unrelated individuals together in a sub-group based on a wide variety of crimes ranging from victim-less to full blown rape and few people care about the details…just keep the “pervert” out of my neighborhood!

How many times is this question going to be asked? How long does it take for the clear and obvious to sink into stupid peoples minds? Is it not clear by now that with the inception of megans law the state opened a Pandora box of problems for it’s self and that the state doesn’t have the honesty to admit it erred to the destruction of countless families and that things got worse when the even smaller minds on the county and city level joined the manufactured witch hunt?

Yes! wake up! Residency bans are a bad thing for everyone and serve no useful purpose; never have and never will.

More distortions by the media to dishonestly report:
“State law bars those on its registry from living within 2,000 feet of a park or school.”

They never mention the tens of thousands whose cases were closed decades ago. If they did that, the hype, hysteria and chaos would be mitigated. Where are the truly informed and honest reporters?